A Fox News story tonight lists a constitution party convention as an underdog that just "might have a shot" in the upcoming election. Well I'd like to ask, how do you "have a shot" when you only have ballot access in 20 states? The constitution party has been nearly defunct for years now. However, by contrast, the Libertarian Party (LP) held its conference in Kansas City 3 weeks ago. Fox conveniently ignored that convention.
I find it difficult to understand why the LP convention was ignored but the constitution party was featured. The constitution party doesn't even have ballot access in Kansas, yet the LP has ballot access in both KS and MO. Furthermore, the LP expects to have access in 48 states again this election cycle, just as it did in the last.
The LP convention featured a debate including former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel, former CNBC Co-anchor, best selling author, self made millionaire and "King of Vegas", Wayne Allyn Root. To top that off, former US House Representative Bob Barr announced his consideration for a run for US President at the convention. Barr is best known for leading the impeachment trials against Bill Clinton. He is currently polling nationwide at 7%, which is huge for a 3rd party candidate.
The LP is the only viable 3rd party in the United States. It is the largest 3rd party, and the fastest growing. But for some reason, it's not newsworthy compared to a party that apparently has nominated a pastor that nobody has ever heard of.
CNN showed up and ran the story nation wide, but for some reason Fox didn't show.
Why?
| Member Comments | Total Comments: 7 |
|
|
JohnKJR
Apr 27, 2008 | 6:28 PM |
|||||
|
JohnKJR
Apr 27, 2008 | 6:30 PM |
|||||
|
jpbikerfreak
Apr 27, 2008 | 7:43 PM |
|||||
|
jdembski
Apr 28, 2008 | 8:29 AM |
|||||
|
jpbikerfreak
Apr 28, 2008 | 9:31 AM |
|||||
|
JohnKJR
Apr 28, 2008 | 9:43 AM |
|||||
|
jdembski
Apr 28, 2008 | 12:35 PM |
|||||
|
|||||
I love to discuss political philosophy. The problem I have is that liberals often assume I'm conservative and convserervatives often assume I'm liberal. It's because I'm neither. I'm libertarian, which means I believe in both social and economic freedom. I don't do personal attacks. I won't respond to yours, and I won't initiate one against you. So save yourself some time if you're thinking of flaming me!
Member Since: 2/20/2008